The Public Interest

The paradox of the exclusionary rule

Caleb Nelson

Summer 1989

IN 1914, one hundred and twenty-three years after the ratification of the Fourth Amendment, the Supreme Court declared that the Amendment was “of no value” if unconstitutionally seized evidence could be used in federal courts. The Court held all such evidence inadmissible.

Download a PDF of the full article.

Download

Sign-in to your National Affairs subscriber account.


Already a subscriber? Activate your account.


subscribe

Unlimited access to intelligent essays on the nation’s affairs.

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to National Affairs.